The whole premise of checking for human writing is daft

# Summary The author argues that obsessing over whether every word was manually typed misses the point of good writing, which should be judged on the quality of ideas, understanding, and decision-making rather than the method of production. Using AI tools thoughtfully—revising, arguing with them, and taking responsibility for the final work—can produce better results than mindlessly typing out words by hand. The fixation on "human writing" resembles historical resistance to transformative tools like fire, which brought genuine risks but also immense benefits.