| |
# Summary A software engineer reflects on why he stopped arguing with people despite valuing correctness, recognizing that being right often damages relationships and fails to change minds. He identifies three key insights: being correct isn't inherently good because it creates a loser in the exchange, most arguments are actually ego-driven conflicts rather than intellectual debates, and people are primarily emotional beings who reason backward to justify their feelings rather than reason objectively. Rather than arguing about right and wrong, he now reserves substantive discussions for genuinely open-minded people engaged in joint problem-solving.
Read Full Article →
← More Other news