What did SFFA vs. Harvard reveal about admissions?

# Summary The SFFA v. Harvard case revealed stark disparities in college admissions: recruited athletes face an 86% admit rate compared to under 5.5% for unhooked domestic applicants—a roughly 17-fold gap—while identical applicants experience dramatically different admission odds based solely on race, with modeled probabilities ranging from 25% for Asian American applicants to 95% for African American applicants. The trial also exposed how elite universities use price discrimination, charging different families vastly different amounts for the same seat based on financial aid formulas rather than the published cost of attendance.