- -dangerously-skip-reading-code – olano.dev

The author argues that skipping code review for LLM-generated output is acceptable if organizations consciously accept the risks and restructure their processes accordingly, since reviewing code faster than LLMs can generate it is impractical. Rather than abandoning rigor entirely, teams should shift quality control to specifications and automated tests while enabling engineers to make autonomous decisions and work on larger feature streams. This approach requires organizational-level commitment and process changes—not just individual team decisions—to actually realize productivity gains.